Hi Readers! I recently read ‘The Dutch House’ by Ann Patchett.
Now, this book is rated at 4.17/5 on Goodreads. Also, it is recommended in every article
that gives stellar book recommendations. It is historical fiction post
WWII. The author Ann Pachett’s books are always bestsellers.
All these four criteria are as best as it can come. I need all these areas to
decide if I should buy or read a book. And yet, despite checking all these
areas, ‘The Dutch House’ was a disappointment. Here’s the autopsy.
~~INTRODUCTION~~
The Dutch House is the story of two siblings Maeve & Danny Conroy
written across five decades. We see a distant mother who leaves them when they
both are still kids. We see an absent father who keeps to himself. We see
Fluffy, the nanny; Sandy, the housekeeper & Jocelyn, the cook. All three of
them are more parents to them than their real parents.
To brief it, Maeve & Danny grow up in the Dutch House. It becomes the House from which their mother leaves. It becomes the House in which Andrea, their stepmother comes in with two of her children. It becomes the house from which Andrea throws out Maeve & Danny when their father dies. And ever since then, it becomes a part of them. Even after twenty years, Maeve & Danny meet to have deep conversations while sitting in a car in front to the House, re-visiting their past time & again.
~~CHARACTERS~~
The narrator in the story is Danny Conroy,
which was such a poor choice. Throughout the novel, Danny comes off as
self-absorbed, irrational, ambitionless & to a certain extent just so
mortal. He claims he is writing the novel for his sister Maeve who is the only
person he has. But, ironically, he only tells his own life tale, ignoring Maeve
completely. He talks about his education & how he became a doctor &
then stopped being a doctor. He talks about his marriage to Celeste. He talks
about his kids, May & Kevin. He mesmerises his love for his absent father.
Danny Conroy is as drag as a character as they come.
Maeve Conroy deserved better. In her childhood, we see how much of a brilliant
character she could have been. She is brilliant, tall & intimidating. The
author built so much scope for Maeve and never ended up using it. There are no efforts
taken on her character! She studies maths, becomes an accountant & then
work at a frozen vegetable shop forever. She has no relationships to such an
extent that we don’t even know sexual identity! She is on the cover page of the
book & yet she isn’t even the highlight of the novel because we got Danny
mansplaining everything in a crude manner. That really bugged me. Apart from
being overshadowed by Danny, she is also overshadowed by her mother (Elna
Conroy.)
As for their mother, Elna Conroy, such a poorly portrayed character. If the
author wanted to show her as a saint, she has failed miserably. Elna is the
most pathetic character in the novel. Sometimes, I feel she is worse than their
absent father, Cyril Conroy. Cyril, though absent toward his children,
did little things for them. He took a divorce from an unstable wife who hated
the Dutch House. He married someone who loved the Dutch House. He mentored
Danny in the real estate business in a very subtle manner. In his own way, he
was the good enough attempt in the story.
As for the title of the novel, there were so few things surrounding the Dutch House. There could have been a lot of scope on that as well.
~~OVERALL
THOUGHTS~~
To be completely honest, reading this novel felt like reading a
very dull first draft from an amateur debut novelist. We have a deluded robot of a
narrator, reprehensible characters which we cannot get
in the mindset of, dull story line & predictable end; all of which make a complete disappointment to the
historical fiction genre. When I read it halfway, I knew it would
not get better, because it was just so plain & dull to read. I think the
author tried to make an impression with the Bildungsroman attempt of writing,
but it has failed for me. Now that I read the book, here I am thinking, what
was the point of it?
Was it about
not being stuck in the past?
Was it
standing up for yourself?
Was it
about forgiveness?
Was it
about maturity?
Was it about
hope?
Because if it were any of this, the opposite of it has happened in the book.
This time I did a lot of research before actually buying the
books & now one out of five has already failed me. I rated this book at 2/5
on Goodreads. Here’s to hoping the rest do better! If you have read & liked
this book, please tell me what is it you liked in the comments below!
Until next time,
No comments:
Post a Comment