Hello Readers! April is about to end already, how crazy is
that? I have already read 7 BOOKS this month & will most likely finish another
by tomorrow, rounding it up to 8! Just like in March! I read V.S. Naipaul’s Miguel Street & it wasn’t to my likes. From my 2020 Reading Challenge, I had to read a book by an Indian author, which is why I thought I’d
read this one. Naipaul’s books are highly acclaimed & so I was intrigued to
read his works. I suppose I started with the wrong one! I have been told that Naipaul’s
‘A House for Mr. Biswas’ & ‘In a Free State’
are really good. So, whenever I feel motivated to read, I will choose one of
those! For now, here’s the review for ‘Miguel Street’.
~~INTRODUCTION~~
Miguel Street is essentially a short novel consisting of interrelated
short stories revolving around the people residing in Miguel Street, Trinidad,
where the author was based in his early years. The narrative is from a young
boy in Miguel Street who observes all the things around him. Along with this,
there is a lot of dialogue between characters all the time. Given that the
story is based in the wartime period in Trinidad, the dialogue is played out
naturally, as the people there would say. Which means, about 85% of the book is
in incorrect English which was the most painful to read. It is a very simple
book with stories of simple people.
~~OVERALL
THOUGHTS~~
I rated this book at 2/5 on Goodreads. It is a book where you
will find people living in poor conditions and yet they have so many hopes
& dreams. So, firstly, I will tell you the few good parts that I liked. While
I hated the prose, I think the structure of having linked short stories was interesting. I
also liked how there are so many calypsos throughout the novel. It was a nice touch, given
that they are originated in Trinidad. While some stories were okay-ish, others
were completely irrational. I liked how a few stories had a sad ending, which
was quite realistic. But, in the overall tone of the book, I failed to find any
hints of humour. It was entirely a dramatic book. And now, moving on to all its faults.
As I mentioned above, I was not a fan of the prose, that is,
the incorrect English. It really made it impossible to read. Even though the
idea of interlinked short stories was good, there could’ve been a lot more sentiment to
it if it would’ve been implemented properly. In most of the stories you will
find men beating their wives & children. Reading something like that with
so many examples of misogyny was quite difficult in the year 2020. I suppose
the best part was that it was a short book,
which lessened the pain of reading it. Anyway, I hate reading bad books which
are just not fulfilling. I took a chance on this one because it was a short book
which also had a 3.94 rating on Goodreads!
Goodreads sure has started to let me down. Anyway, I hope I will like V.S.
Naipaul’s other books.
Currently, I am reading Lolita by
Vladimir Nabokov, Untamed by Glennon Doyle & Harry Potter and the Prisoner
of Azkaban by J.K. Rowling! I am not at all enjoying Lolita, which
is obvious, I guess. On the other hand, reading Harry Potter is giving me all
the joy. And, I really hope I like Untamed. It is another highly rated novel,
but my bet is that I will like it. Let’s hope!
Until next time,
No comments:
Post a Comment